Accessible Reporting |  Site Map |  Feedback |  Download |  How to Join  
*
The Co-operative Bank*
*

Audit and Commentary |  Partnership Report 2002 |  Our Performance |  Home
*
**
*
Auditor's Statement
Audit Approach
Assessment of Delivering Value >>
Assessment of Social Responsibility
Assessment of Ecological Sustainability

Financial Statements 2002

This site has been designed to enable visitors to change the size of the text that appears on pages by adjusting their browser settings. If the text on this page is too small: In Internet Explorer, click on 'Text size' in the 'View' menu and adjust accordingly or, in Netscape, click on 'Increase font'
*
Audit and Commentary : Assessment of Delivering Value
*
assessment of delivering value: the centre for tomorrow's company
The Centre for Tomorrow's Company is a think tank and catalyst, researching and stimulating the development of a new agenda for business. The Centre represents a practical vision of sustainable business which makes sense to shareholders and society.

I remain impressed by the openness and breadth of the Partnership Report. Its underlying logic remains very clear - it sets out purpose and values, defines the key stakeholder relationships and uses clear indicators relevant to that purpose and those values. The bank regularly asks stakeholders what matters most to them and measures progress consistently against these yardsticks. It welcomes criticism and uses that criticism for continuous improvement of the reporting and thereby of the impact and performance of the business.

My main concern over recent years has been consistency, and most of my suggestions and comments this year relate to this theme.

The Co-operative Bank and Co-operative Financial Services This is clearly the report of the bank, not CFS. However, the Chief Executive's statement opens with the announcement of the formation of CFS and his own appointment as its Chief Executive. It will be interesting to observe the extent to which the well-regarded sustainability reports of The Co-operative Bank and CIS converge in the future and how comparability will be protected through the process.

Consistency over time The key indicators shown in "performance over time at a glance" represents a very important part of the report. I did suggest that in future this key page shows a five year summary so that readers can track the ups and downs for themselves. The current style of summary shows only the earliest and most recent performance figure, but not the movement in between. The bank is reluctant to complicate the summary, but reassured me that, in the main body of the document, as more years' data becomes available, a five year summary will be used.

Consistency: Staff Indicators and Targets Last year, I commented upon the staff indicators and drew attention to one or two areas where, against an otherwise healthy picture, some deterioration was evident. In particular, I singled out the indicator that showed that in 2001 47% of staff 'felt under inappropriate pressure in my current role', along with lower levels of satisfaction for career progression and a quarter of the staff disagreeing with the statement that 'the bank behaves ethically in the way it treats the staff'. There is a slight improvement on career progression. But the basis of the other two indicators has been changed. I understand that feedback from staff indicated that the questions were difficult to answer. Nonetheless this appears inconsistent with a commitment made by the bank in the 2000 Partnership Report where it was agreed that where the basis of an indicator was changed and comparability with past years compromised, the previous indicator would be retained at least for the year in which the change was made.

One of the most important and distinctive features of the bank's reporting has been its use of targets. When I first saw this report, I said that I was concerned that the targets offered for this year were not as stretching as in the past. I appreciate that the combination of CIS and The Co-operative Bank during 2003, and the movement of staff between the two entities and the holding company Co-operative Financial Services, may make year-on-year quantitative comparisons less directly meaningful. Nonetheless I still suggested more demanding targets should be set.

I recommended that the bank look for improvement in performance in key areas such as the percentage of staff who believe managers have very good people skills (currently 49%) or the percentage who agree that they are very fairly treated (currently 60%). I also suggested that it may well be in the interests of the organisation and its stakeholders to commit to an indicator that reflects how well staff feel the merger is being handled and what, if any, affect it has on their overall loyalty to the organisation.

I am pleased to report that the bank has now accepted the target relating to the staff assessment of managers' people skills and will continue to undertake and publish the results of consultations with staff as the organisational changes unfold.

Mark Goyder's signature
Mark Goyder
11th March 2003
Mark Goyder
Mark Goyder, Director of the Centre for Tomorrow's Company
Continue to: Assessment of Social Responsibility Back To Top